Monday, January 14, 2013

Erie's Development Landscape has Changed

Dear Erie Neighbors,

At the last Board of Trustee meeting, Erie’s development landscape changed.  I am concerned we are no longer a town that prioritizes quality in the long term and errors on the side of health and safety.  For the first time in Erie’s modern history, housing development is no longer required to pay it’s own way.

I watched in amazement as the developers of Bridgewater (2700 Homes) and Summerfield (2200 Homes), Community Development Group (CDG), dazzled the majority of the Board. 


The Mayor led the way in two votes that forever will change Erie. 

First, Erie annexed Summerfield outside of our Unified Development Code (UDC) which was created to ensure high quality development.  This was done using a recently passed change which allows for developers to write their own standards.  We don't even know the complete details of what was changed from the UDC.  One thing we know for sure is that natural gas well setbacks were reduced by over 40% to 200 feet.

In the second vote, the majority approved developer incentives to the tune of $2.8 million and a deferral of another $1.2 million for sewer services.  The $2.8 million came in the reduction of transportation and drainage impact fees.  To put this into perspective, each new Bridgewater home in Phase I will be subsidized by over $3500.

Equally important, this reduces funds available to mitigate impacts of this development.  For example, Erie will not collect $800,000 that was in the original annexation agreement for transportation impacts.  So when Erie Parkway needs to be expanded to accommodate the increase in traffic caused by Bridgewater, there will be less money to do this and ultimately it will have to come from the taxpayers of Erie.

I first asked for an extension to make the Bridgewater decision since the information was only shared with some of the Trustees hours before our meeting.    When I could not get the majority of Trustees to agree, I spoke out against the resolution to provide financial incentives.  To me, the future of Erie and our finances spoke louder than to rush through an approval.

In defense of those who voted in favor of housing development incentives, I believe that they felt in their hearts Bridgewater is the answer to many of Erie’s long term economic challenges.  More people sooner means more consumers in Erie which would draw a second grocer and possibly other big boxes our way.   

I spoke out against the incentives not because I am against development, I’m not, but because I believe adding more housing supply at your expense will not increase housing demand.  


We already have over 1000 build-able lots in Erie today and have exceeded our budgeted number of new houses sold in Erie in the past year by 125%.   In the past, Erie did this without waiving the developers responsibility to pay for the impacts they bring to our community.
 
Current approved development can satiate any demand for the next 3-4 years.  Basic economics will say that more housing supply will reduce current housing values in the short term.

There is more to be said.  For now, know I will continue to work to ensure your tax dollars are not used to mitigate housing development impacts.  I want quality, fiscal responsibility, and safety to be high priority considerations for Erie.

Take care,
Janice

Watch the meeting by clicking here.
Find the Bridgewater incentive agreement by clicking here.

7 comments:

  1. Well the mayor is a realtor. I am not saying he is paid to vote this way, but he will get paid in the future with contracts.
    Is there a counsl of cities we can appeal to? Can we get assesment of the future cost to the city and put it to vote

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Erie citizens used to vote on these annexations and developments. Were ballot measures considered too cumbersome? Erie government needs more checks and balances

      Delete
  2. I have the same thing going on across the street from me - Flatiron Meadows. The recent Planning Commission meeting changed the original plat from an apartment building to "patio homes". Even tho' that is better; it begs the question as to what fees were waived to build these homes with 5 ft setbacks ala Erie Commons. This kind of unbridled growth at the expense of the People, lining the pockets of developers, makes me not want to live in Erie - & I'm sure I'm not alone.
    I moved to Erie to get away from urban sprawl; for the rural environment of peace & quiet; a nice place to raise kids.
    How can we swing Erie's compass back to a true course of responsible development...
    Phillip Bradbury


    ReplyDelete
  3. This part is very disturbing to me... "This was done using a recently passed change which allows for developers to write their own standards. We don't even know the complete details of what was changed from the UDC."

    Perhaps I need to pay more attention - but I wasn't aware of this change, and therefore do not understand the rationale. I hope there are still some checks and balances in the system?

    Thank you Trustee Moore for enabling awareness of happenings and concerns.

    ReplyDelete
  4. Thanks for the information Janice. Please keep it coming.

    ReplyDelete
  5. Thank you for the information Janice. Its quite unfortunate that the board is moving forward recklessly with these new development projects as you stated that there is no need to change the UDC and now that civic improvements will fall to tax payers. I do have another glaring concern is that there is absolutely no talk of any commercial development that would bring jobs, services and an established backbone of industry to this area. The tax base is upside down with no movement to balance the scales which would reduce home owner tax burden while increasing civic improvements and development. There is no focus or direction on a sustainable future for Erie. The Board and the Mayor are short sighted and have misused the influence they have been empowered with. Changes need to be addressed and made in my opinion. Please keep working for the current residents of Erie as it seems that your colleges have a different agenda.

    ReplyDelete
  6. What is happening to Erie is a travesty. Those of us who live in unicorporated Weld County cannot vote, nor will we pay the additional taxes that Erie residents will be paying to support Mayor Joe Wilson's 125% growth plan. What do you think will happen to the welfare of Erie families by adding 5000 homes? That almost doubles the population of Erie...now the fastest growing city in the state of CO.
    The reason you chose to move to Erie...small town, feeling of safe environment, great schools, no traffic congestion, reasonable taxes is all going to change.
    You need to educate yourself on what is going on in your own backyard!
    Sarah Hodgson

    ReplyDelete